An original risk of ovarian malignancy index and its predictive value in evaluating the nature of ovarian tumour
Keywords:
ovarian cancer, serum cancer antigen 125, CA-125, ultrasound, risk of ovarian malignancy indexAbstract
Background: We carried out this study to evaluate the predictive value of an original risk of ovarian malignancy index (ROMI) devised by us. Method: Our ROMI was the simple sum of points from the three-stage gradation of serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), data from the patient’s familial and personal history and the ultrasound characteristics of the tumour (i.e. tumour size ? 6 cm, multilocularity, tumour with ? ¼ solid areas, dense and opalescent liquid, septum or papillary vegetation ? 3 mm), ascites, bilaterality, an unclear margin with respect to the surrounding tissue and thickness of the capsule ? 3 mm. Its originality lay in the three-stage CA-125 gradation, namely < 35 U/ml (1 point), 35-129 U/ml (3 points) and ? 130 U/ml (5 points). The study group comprised 274 patients divided into a group with benign tumours (BOT) (n = 205), and a group with malignant tumours (MOT) (n = 69). Both groups were subdivided into three subgroups of ROMI ? 11 (low risk), ROMI 12-14 (unclear risk) and ROMI ? 15 (high risk). Results: The cut-off ROMI of ? 11 showed high sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, 0.93 and 0.83, respectively. The cut-off ROMI of ? 14 demonstrated extremely high specificity of 0.985, but lower sensitivity and AUC, of 0.57 and 0.78, respectively. Conclusion: Our newly devised ROMI and its cut-off of ? 11 is very effective in excluding, as well as confirming, ovarian cancer.Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
South African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology (SAJGO) Copyright is held by South African Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (SASGO). Copyright of the articles is held by the authors. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial Works 4.0 South Africa License (CC BY NC). Material submitted for publication in the SAJGO is accepted provided it has not been published elsewhere. The SAJGO does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do no purport to reflect the opinions or views of SASGO or its members.